CoderCorgi
← Back to Alex’s page

An explorable taxonomy · 156 entries

Personal Growth
Modalities

Most maps of this field sort by topic and collapse, because one modality lands in four boxes. This one sorts by mechanism: which layer of the person a method works on. Lineage and everything else are filters, so the field's hidden family resemblances become things you can look up.

New here?
Click any name to open its record. Records are cards you can drag and compare side by side.
Not advice
A map, not a recommendation, and nothing here is medical advice.

A sorting tool, not a recommendation

Sort by lens

Each entry is scored on six things: reach, evidence, ceiling, speed of signal, ease of entry, and how little it asks of you. There's no single “best,” because that depends on the person, so pick a lens under Weight by to decide what counts. Heavier type on the maps means a higher score.

The substrate cluster wins nearly every lens (sleep, exercise, walking, close relationships). And a low score is not a verdict: something obscure, expensive or slow to show results scores low even if it works well.

Lineage
Facets
Weight by
Find

Map one

The mechanism plane

Vertical: how deep the method reaches, from symbolic and top-down at the top to somatic and bottom-up at the bottom. Horizontal: how much of the work needs another person. Dot color is lineage; heavier type means a higher score under the current lens. The horizontal axis means far more in the bottom two rows than the top two.

⚠
Cautions are well-known contraindications, not a medical review. A blank is not a clearance: medication, pregnancy, cardiac history, psychosis or bipolar risk, or an eating-disorder history want a clinician rather than a website.
◈
Contested: the theory or the organization is disputed, which is not the same as not working.
◐
Not while depleted: asks a lot of an already-stretched system.
On your ownMostly aloneOne-to-oneGroup
Symbolic ← → Somatic

Map two

Eight lineages, six eras

Same records, sorted by descent. Read across a lane to watch a tradition develop, or down a column to see one era at once. The 1970s were the founding decade: est, NLP, Focusing, Inner Game, Goenka's Western courses and MBSR all arrived within ten years.

Across lineages

Same move, different name

Techniques that recur across unrelated lineages; color shows how far apart they started. The sharpest answer to “why do these all feel the same?” Each record also lists what it pairs with, what it's redundant with, and what it builds on.

Where this came from

Sources & how this was made

This atlas began as an academic taxonomy of named schools, then merged with christineist’s “Self-Healing Menu Platter”, a community sheet whose unit is different: not institutions but moves you can make tonight. Each is right about its own half.

The sheet added co-regulation as a mechanism (cuddling, eye gazing), ritual and imaginal work, expressive modes, sexuality as a practice, the depth-psychodynamic column, a detailed substrate row, and pairs well with: practitioner knowledge about combinations that no academic source records.

The atlas added lineage, era, evidence tier, commercial structure and failure modes. Filter by Source to see either half alone.

Content drawn from:

  • My personal journals and practice notes
  • Research with Claude (Anthropic’s Claude Opus)
  • christineist’s “Self-Healing Menu Platter”, a community spreadsheet of psychotechnologies

Not medical advice. Corrections welcome: codercorgi@gmail.com.